Google Takeout lets you easily export your data from Circles

 
The Data Liberation Front (DLF), a left-wing guerrilla group of Googlers, has finally launched its first service: Google Takeout. Just sign in, select which Google services you want to back up, and then click Creative Archive. Each of the services will be tidily backed up to a zip file in open formats that can be imported into other, non-Google web services. To start with, Takeout only supports the easy exporting of Buzz, Picasa, your Google Profile, Contacts, and Circles — Google’s recently-launched Facebook competitor — but the eventual plan is to provide easy exporting for every Google service.
If you haven’t heard of them before, the DLF is a group and a website that helps you extract your data from Google’s web services into open, easily-transferable file formats. You can then take your email or docs or RSS feeds and import them into an installed program, or Microsoft or Yahoo’s equivalent web service. Curiously enough, though, the DLF is an engineering team at Google. The idea isn’t that they want you to transfer your data away from Google — they just think it’s important that you can. It’s basically Google’s way of showing that the data it holds in its massive database is yours, and you’re free to do what you like with it; it’s the embodiment of Google’s corporate Don’t Be Evil motto, in other words.
The timing of Google Takeout is highly suspect — but in a good way. Just last night, Google launched Google+, along with its Facebookesque Circles service. Facebook makes it notoriously hard for users to extract their data and photos, while Google Takeout and the Data Liberation Front will ensure that Circles remains very open. Having said that, Facebook recently crossed the 750 million user mark, and scant few have complained about the difficult privacy controls or the inability to export data in open formats. Circles will undoubtedly be popular among certain groups — and Takeout is definitely a juicy sweetener — but whether it can actually draw significant numbers of users away from Facebook remains to be seen.

Google +1 Spreads Around the World

 
Google +1, the social recommendation feature that lets users indicate their favorite pages, is picking up steam. Google is continuing to push the feature – in both its webmaster button form and the social search results connected to +1s – by releasing the feature in numerous additional countries.

+1's Increasing Momentum

The thought that Google +1 was part of a larger social construct has gained both more weight and some contradictory evidence with the release of Google+ – the actual Google social site that we've been bleeding for over the last year (editor's note: check back for more coverage on Google+ later today on Search Engine Watch). While +1s are likely to get an integration with the Google social network, much in the same way that Facebook Likes are integrated with the Facebook news stream, the +1 feature is also meant to stand alone.
The +1 experiment started in March, webmasters got the button to add to their site earlier this month, Google has since added a +1 button to numerous properties (such as product pages and Blogger widgets), +1 counts – some of which are localized – are appearing in search results, and the product is continuing to gain momentum. As part of that snowball effect, Google is spreading +1 around the world.

Google+ social network aims to face down Facebook

Remember way back in February of 2010, when Google introduced a social media service called Google Buzz, and all the bloggers marveled that Google was so boldly taking on Facebook? Well, that didn't work out so well. Now Google is really taking on Facebook, and not just in a half-hearted kind of way. Witness the unveiling of Google+, a full-featured social network that aims to "bring the nuance and richness of real-life sharing to software."
"Today, the connections between people increasingly happen online," Google executive Vic Gundotra wrote in a statement announcing Google+. "Yet the subtlety and substance of real-world interactions are lost in the rigidness of our online tools. In this basic, human way, online sharing is awkward. Even broken. And we aim to fix it. We’d like to bring the nuance and richness of real-life sharing to software."

RELATED: With Office 365, Microsoft says, hey, Google, get off of my 'cloud' 

Check the video below for more details, but basically Google+ is a more layered version of Facebook, built around something dubbed "Circles." The idea is simple: You don't have just one kind of friend, and you shouldn't have just one kind of online social circle. So unlike Facebook, Google+ allows you to create a whole bunch of circles – co-workers, for instance, or best friends – and share content and comments specifically with each circle.
Meanwhile, 

Google+ will also get the so-called "Sparks" feature, which is essentially a variation on the Facebook "like" functionality: See something you like, and you can instantly post it to your profile. Of course, since this is Google we're talking, the Sparks button will likely be omnipresent. But have no fear! Google is really stressing the security thing.

"You and over a billion others trust Google, and we don’t take this lightly," Gundotra wrote. "In fact we’ve focused on the user for over a decade: liberating data, working for an open Internet, and respecting people’s freedom to be who they want to be. We realize, however, that Google+ is a different kind of project, requiring a different kind of focus – on you."
That "different focus" comes by way of a dynamic and varied table of security and privacy options – something it took Facebook a long time to do. In fact, Ben Parr writes over at Mashable, just about everything Google+ does is about facing down Facebook.
"The two companies are in heated competition for talent, page views and consumers," Parr writes. "While Google controls the search market and has a strong presence on mobile with Android, it hasn’t been able to crack the social nut. Its most successful social product, YouTube, had to be acquired, and it still ranks as one of the most expensive acquisitions in the company’s history."