Google Takeout lets you easily export your data from Circles

 
The Data Liberation Front (DLF), a left-wing guerrilla group of Googlers, has finally launched its first service: Google Takeout. Just sign in, select which Google services you want to back up, and then click Creative Archive. Each of the services will be tidily backed up to a zip file in open formats that can be imported into other, non-Google web services. To start with, Takeout only supports the easy exporting of Buzz, Picasa, your Google Profile, Contacts, and Circles — Google’s recently-launched Facebook competitor — but the eventual plan is to provide easy exporting for every Google service.
If you haven’t heard of them before, the DLF is a group and a website that helps you extract your data from Google’s web services into open, easily-transferable file formats. You can then take your email or docs or RSS feeds and import them into an installed program, or Microsoft or Yahoo’s equivalent web service. Curiously enough, though, the DLF is an engineering team at Google. The idea isn’t that they want you to transfer your data away from Google — they just think it’s important that you can. It’s basically Google’s way of showing that the data it holds in its massive database is yours, and you’re free to do what you like with it; it’s the embodiment of Google’s corporate Don’t Be Evil motto, in other words.
The timing of Google Takeout is highly suspect — but in a good way. Just last night, Google launched Google+, along with its Facebookesque Circles service. Facebook makes it notoriously hard for users to extract their data and photos, while Google Takeout and the Data Liberation Front will ensure that Circles remains very open. Having said that, Facebook recently crossed the 750 million user mark, and scant few have complained about the difficult privacy controls or the inability to export data in open formats. Circles will undoubtedly be popular among certain groups — and Takeout is definitely a juicy sweetener — but whether it can actually draw significant numbers of users away from Facebook remains to be seen.

Google +1 Spreads Around the World

 
Google +1, the social recommendation feature that lets users indicate their favorite pages, is picking up steam. Google is continuing to push the feature – in both its webmaster button form and the social search results connected to +1s – by releasing the feature in numerous additional countries.

+1's Increasing Momentum

The thought that Google +1 was part of a larger social construct has gained both more weight and some contradictory evidence with the release of Google+ – the actual Google social site that we've been bleeding for over the last year (editor's note: check back for more coverage on Google+ later today on Search Engine Watch). While +1s are likely to get an integration with the Google social network, much in the same way that Facebook Likes are integrated with the Facebook news stream, the +1 feature is also meant to stand alone.
The +1 experiment started in March, webmasters got the button to add to their site earlier this month, Google has since added a +1 button to numerous properties (such as product pages and Blogger widgets), +1 counts – some of which are localized – are appearing in search results, and the product is continuing to gain momentum. As part of that snowball effect, Google is spreading +1 around the world.

Has Google Learned From Social Failure

 
With Google+, it looks like the search giant may have finally built a social product that people will use.
Shortly after Google announced the new social networking service, executives Bradley Horowitz and Vic Gundotra (who are leading the company's social efforts) spoke with Adweek about the lessons they've learned from past failures, both inside and outside Google. The company's most infamous social fumble was its product Google Buzz, which many users saw as a violation of their privacy—as did the Federal Trade Commission. Horowitz said that's symptomatic of of larger problem that he called "overfriending": When you're friends with too many people on a service like Facebook, then you don't want to share anything private. Google+, on the other hand, introduces the idea of Circles. Users divide their connections into categories like "friends" and "acquaintances", then they share things (a comment, say, or a photo) with whichever circle they want.
"We've built a product that's good for a shout and good for a whisper," Horowitz said.
There are other pieces to Google+, like Hangout, a video chat service, and Sparks, where users can find and share content around their interests. And unlike Buzz, Google+ feels easy-to-use and intuitive, rather than overwhelming and confusing—at least judging from an hour or two of poking around. (The service is not yet open to most people, and can only be accessed by those invited to do so; an Adweek editor received a press invite.) Users just drag-and-drop their friends into different circles, then when they're ready to share things, they select the appropriate circle from a menu, or choose to share with everyone.
As people wrap their heads around the Circles concept, there will probably be some confusion. For example, it may not be clear that the relationships aren't reciprocal. You can list someone as a close friend, but that friend might say they're only an acquaintance, or leave you out of their Circles entirely. Still, the system is much simpler than Facebook's rather Byzantine privacy controls.
Here's the bigger question: If people like Google+ as a product, will they switch over even though all their friends are still on Facebook? Gundotra thinks they will—he noted that it's normal to belong to multiple online social services, so people don't have to choose between Facebook or Google. And, he argued, Google+ will become even more useful as new features are added in the coming months, especially as it's integrated with existing Google services.
Integration brings a new set of risks—one reason people freaked out about Buzz was the fact that it was part of Gmail. Gundotra said that gradually inviting users into a "field test" will help Google find the right balance between sharing and privacy.
And, he argued, these kinds of social projects are crucial for Google's future, like it or not.